85R9733 MAW-F
 
  By: Smithee H.B. No. 3133
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the use of in-custody informant testimony in a criminal
  trial.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Article 38.075, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended to read as follows:
         Art. 38.075.  [CORROBORATION OF CERTAIN] TESTIMONY OF
  IN-CUSTODY INFORMANT WITNESS [REQUIRED].
         Sec. 1.  DEFINITIONS.  In this article:
               (1)  "Attorney representing the state" means a district
  attorney, a criminal district attorney, or a county attorney with
  criminal jurisdiction.
               (2)  "Benefit" means any deal, payment, leniency,
  inducement, or other advantage that is offered or provided to an
  in-custody informant in exchange for testimony, including:
                     (A)  leniency in any criminal case or in a
  community supervision or parole matter, including a decision not to
  make an arrest or file charges with respect to an offense, a
  decision to reduce the number or severity of charges, or a decision
  to reduce a sentence;
                     (B)  money;
                     (C)  assistance with a change in immigration
  status;
                     (D)  in-kind benefits such as food, housing, or
  travel;
                     (E)  in-custody benefits such as visiting
  privileges, transfer to better living conditions, or enhanced
  access to food, entertainment, or other amenities; and
                     (F)  any benefit that is conferred on a third
  party and that results directly or indirectly from the in-custody
  informant's testimony.
               (3)  "Correctional facility" has the meaning assigned
  by Section 1.07, Penal Code.
               (4)  "In-custody informant" means a person to whom a
  defendant makes a statement against the defendant's interest while
  the person is imprisoned or confined in the same correctional
  facility as the defendant.
               (5)  "In-custody informant index" means a centralized
  index that includes information and records related to in-custody
  informants who may or may not be used as witnesses in criminal
  trials.
         Sec. 2.  MAINTAINING AND DISCLOSING IN-CUSTODY INFORMANT
  INFORMATION. (a) Each attorney representing the state shall adopt
  and implement a detailed written policy regarding the creation and
  maintenance of an in-custody informant index.
         (b)  The policy must require that information and records
  concerning cases in which an in-custody informant testified or
  offered to testify are maintained in the in-custody informant
  index, including, at a minimum, the following:
               (1)  a summary of the informant's testimony and, if
  available, a copy of the testimony;
               (2)  any benefit offered or provided to the informant;
               (3)  whether the informant has at any time changed the
  informant's statement or testimony regarding a statement allegedly
  made by the defendant;
               (4)  the complete criminal history of the informant,
  including:
                     (A)  any pending charges or investigations in
  which the informant is a suspect; and
                     (B)  evidence of any prior offense committed by
  the informant, regardless of whether the offense resulted in
  conviction; and
               (5)  any other information relevant to the credibility
  of the informant, including any history of mental illness or drug or
  alcohol abuse.
         (c)  The policy must require that any information or records
  maintained under Subsection (b) relating to an in-custody informant
  in the defendant's case be disclosed to the defendant and the
  defendant's attorney.
         Sec. 3.  PRETRIAL RELIABILITY HEARING. The testimony of an
  in-custody informant is not admissible against a defendant in a
  criminal trial, whether offered in the guilt or innocence phase or
  the punishment phase of the trial, unless:
               (1)  on or before the 14th day before the date the trial
  begins, the attorney representing the state:
                     (A)  notifies the defendant of:
                           (i)  the state's intention to offer the
  testimony; and
                           (ii)  the name of the informant; and
                     (B)  provides the defendant with a written summary
  of the testimony to be offered and a copy of all prior written,
  oral, or recorded statements of the informant concerning the
  defendant;
               (2)  the judge finds, in a hearing conducted outside
  the presence of the jury, that the testimony of the informant is
  reliable after considering relevant factors, including:
                     (A)  any benefit offered or provided to the
  informant;
                     (B)  the time, date, location, and substance of:
                           (i)  any statement allegedly made by the
  defendant to the informant; and
                           (ii)  any informant statement that was given
  to a law enforcement agency and that implicates the defendant in the
  offense charged;
                     (C)  whether the informant has at any time changed
  the informant's statement or testimony regarding a statement
  allegedly made by the defendant;
                     (D)  the complete criminal history of the
  informant, including:
                           (i)  any pending charges or investigations
  in which the informant is a suspect; and
                           (ii)  evidence of any prior offense
  committed by the informant, regardless of whether the offense
  resulted in conviction;
                     (E)  previous prosecutions in which the informant
  testified or offered to testify, and any benefits offered or
  provided to the informant; and
                     (F)  any other information relevant to the
  credibility of the informant, including any history of mental
  illness or drug or alcohol abuse; and
               (3)  the testimony is otherwise admissible under the
  Texas Rules of Evidence.
         Sec. 4.  ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR OFFENSES. Notwithstanding
  Rule 609, Texas Rules of Evidence, if testimony of an in-custody
  informant is admitted at trial, evidence of prior offenses
  committed by the informant, regardless of whether the informant was
  convicted, may be admitted for the purpose of impeachment.
         Sec. 5.  JURY INSTRUCTION. If testimony of an in-custody
  informant is admitted at trial, on request of the defendant, the
  court may instruct the jury to:
               (1)  examine and weigh the testimony of the informant
  with greater care and scrutiny than the testimony of other
  witnesses; and
               (2)  consider the factors listed in Section 3(2) in
  assessing the reliability of the testimony.
         Sec. 6.  CORROBORATION REQUIRED. (a) A defendant may not be
  convicted of an offense on the testimony of an in-custody informant
  [a person to whom the defendant made a statement against the
  defendant's interest during a time when the person was imprisoned
  or confined in the same correctional facility as the defendant]
  unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to
  connect the defendant with the offense committed.  [In this
  subsection, "correctional facility" has the meaning assigned by
  Section 1.07, Penal Code.]
         (b)  Corroboration is not sufficient for the purposes of this
  section [article] if the corroboration only shows that the offense
  was committed.
         SECTION 2.  The change in law made by this Act applies to the
  admissibility of evidence in a criminal proceeding that commences
  on or after the effective date of this Act. The admissibility of
  evidence in a criminal proceeding that commences before the
  effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the
  date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in
  effect for that purpose.
         SECTION 3.  Each attorney representing the state shall adopt
  and implement the written policy required by Section 2, Article
  38.075, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, not later
  than January 1, 2018.
         SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2017.