By: Hinojosa, Schwertner  S.B. No. 293
         (In the Senate - Filed December 14, 2016; January 30, 2017,
  read first time and referred to Committee on Health & Human
  Services; March 30, 2017, reported adversely, with favorable
  Committee Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 9, Nays 0;
  March 30, 2017, sent to printer.)
Click here to see the committee vote
 
  COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 293 By:  Uresti
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
 
  relating to the proof required to impose payment holds in certain
  cases of alleged fraud by Medicaid providers.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 531.102(g), Government Code, is amended
  to read as follows:
         (g)(1)  Whenever the office learns or has reason to suspect
  that a provider's records are being withheld, concealed, destroyed,
  fabricated, or in any way falsified, the office shall immediately
  refer the case to the state's Medicaid fraud control unit.  However,
  such criminal referral does not preclude the office from continuing
  its investigation of the provider, which investigation may lead to
  the imposition of appropriate administrative or civil sanctions.
               (2)  As authorized under state and federal law, and
  except as provided by Subdivisions (8) and (9), the office shall
  impose without prior notice a payment hold on claims for
  reimbursement submitted by a provider only to compel production of
  records, when requested by the state's Medicaid fraud control unit,
  or on the determination that a credible allegation of fraud exists,
  subject to Subsections (l) and (m), as applicable.  The payment hold
  is a serious enforcement tool that the office imposes to mitigate
  ongoing financial risk to the state.  A payment hold imposed under
  this subdivision takes effect immediately.  The office must notify
  the provider of the payment hold in accordance with 42 C.F.R.
  Section 455.23(b) and, except as provided by that regulation, not
  later than the fifth day after the date the office imposes the
  payment hold.  In addition to the requirements of 42 C.F.R. Section
  455.23(b), the notice of payment hold provided under this
  subdivision must also include:
                     (A)  the specific basis for the hold, including
  identification of the claims supporting the allegation at that
  point in the investigation, a representative sample of any
  documents that form the basis for the hold, and a detailed summary
  of the office's evidence relating to the allegation;
                     (B)  a description of administrative and judicial
  due process rights and remedies, including the provider's option to
  seek informal resolution, the provider's right to seek a formal
  administrative appeal hearing, or that the provider may seek both;
  and
                     (C)  a detailed timeline for the provider to
  pursue the rights and remedies described in Paragraph (B).
               (3)  On timely written request by a provider subject to
  a payment hold under Subdivision (2), other than a hold requested by
  the state's Medicaid fraud control unit, the office shall file a
  request with the State Office of Administrative Hearings for an
  expedited administrative hearing regarding the hold not later than
  the third day after the date the office receives the provider's
  request.  The provider must request an expedited administrative
  hearing under this subdivision not later than the 10th day after the
  date the provider receives notice from the office under Subdivision
  (2).  The State Office of Administrative Hearings shall hold the
  expedited administrative hearing not later than the 45th day after
  the date the State Office of Administrative Hearings receives the
  request for the hearing.  In a hearing held under this subdivision:
                     (A)  the provider and the office are each limited
  to four hours of testimony, excluding time for responding to
  questions from the administrative law judge;
                     (B)  the provider and the office are each entitled
  to two continuances under reasonable circumstances; and
                     (C)  the office is required to show probable cause
  that the credible allegation of fraud that is the basis of the
  payment hold has an indicia of reliability and that continuing to
  pay the provider presents:
                           (i)  an ongoing significant financial risk
  that [to] the state may lose more than $100,000; or [and]
                           (ii)  a threat to the integrity of Medicaid
  as defined in rules adopted by the executive commissioner, in
  consultation with the office.
               (4)  The office is responsible for the costs of a
  hearing held under Subdivision (3), but a provider is responsible
  for the provider's own costs incurred in preparing for the hearing.
               (5)  In a hearing held under Subdivision (3), the
  administrative law judge shall decide if the payment hold should
  continue but may not adjust the amount or percent of the payment
  hold.  Notwithstanding any other law, including Section
  2001.058(e), the decision of the administrative law judge is final
  and may not be appealed.
               (6)  The executive commissioner, in consultation with
  the office, shall adopt rules that allow a provider subject to a
  payment hold under Subdivision (2), other than a hold requested by
  the state's Medicaid fraud control unit, to seek an informal
  resolution of the issues identified by the office in the notice
  provided under that subdivision.  A provider must request an
  initial informal resolution meeting under this subdivision not
  later than the deadline prescribed by Subdivision (3) for
  requesting an expedited administrative hearing.  On receipt of a
  timely request, the office shall decide whether to grant the
  provider's request for an initial informal resolution meeting, and
  if the office decides to grant the request, the office shall
  schedule the initial informal resolution meeting.  The office shall
  give notice to the provider of the time and place of the initial
  informal resolution meeting.  A provider may request a second
  informal resolution meeting after the date of the initial informal
  resolution meeting.  On receipt of a timely request, the office
  shall decide whether to grant the provider's request for a second
  informal resolution meeting, and if the office decides to grant the
  request, the office shall schedule the second informal resolution
  meeting.  The office shall give notice to the provider of the time
  and place of the second informal resolution meeting.  A provider
  must have an opportunity to provide additional information before
  the second informal resolution meeting for consideration by the
  office.  A provider's decision to seek an informal resolution under
  this subdivision does not extend the time by which the provider must
  request an expedited administrative hearing under Subdivision (3).  
  The informal resolution process shall run concurrently with the
  administrative hearing process, and the informal resolution
  process shall be discontinued once the State Office of
  Administrative Hearings issues a final determination on the payment
  hold.
               (7)  The office shall, in consultation with the state's
  Medicaid fraud control unit, establish guidelines under which
  program exclusions:
                     (A)  may permissively be imposed on a provider; or
                     (B)  shall automatically be imposed on a provider.
               (7-a)  The office shall, in consultation with the
  state's Medicaid fraud control unit, establish guidelines
  regarding the imposition of payment holds authorized under
  Subdivision (2).
               (8)  In accordance with 42 C.F.R. Sections 455.23(e)
  and (f), on the determination that a credible allegation of fraud
  exists, the office may find that good cause exists to not impose a
  payment hold, to not continue a payment hold, to impose a payment
  hold only in part, or to convert a payment hold imposed in whole to
  one imposed only in part, if any of the following are applicable:
                     (A)  law enforcement officials have specifically
  requested that a payment hold not be imposed because a payment hold
  would compromise or jeopardize an investigation;
                     (B)  available remedies implemented by the state
  other than a payment hold would more effectively or quickly protect
  Medicaid funds;
                     (C)  the office determines, based on the
  submission of written evidence by the provider who is the subject of
  the payment hold, that the payment hold should be removed;
                     (D)  Medicaid recipients' access to items or
  services would be jeopardized by a full or partial payment hold
  because the provider who is the subject of the payment hold:
                           (i)  is the sole community physician or the
  sole source of essential specialized services in a community; or
                           (ii)  serves a large number of Medicaid
  recipients within a designated medically underserved area;
                     (E)  the attorney general declines to certify that
  a matter continues to be under investigation; or
                     (F)  the office determines that a full or partial
  payment hold is not in the best interests of Medicaid.
               (9)  The office may not impose a payment hold on claims
  for reimbursement submitted by a provider for medically necessary
  services for which the provider has obtained prior authorization
  from the commission or a contractor of the commission unless the
  office has evidence that the provider has materially misrepresented
  documentation relating to those services.
         SECTION 2.  As soon as practicable after the effective date
  of this Act, the executive commissioner of the Health and Human
  Services Commission shall adopt the rules required by Section
  531.102(g)(3)(C)(ii), Government Code, as added by this Act.
         SECTION 3.  If before implementing any provision of this Act
  a state agency determines that a waiver or authorization from a
  federal agency is necessary for implementation of that provision,
  the agency affected by the provision shall request the waiver or
  authorization and may delay implementing that provision until the
  waiver or authorization is granted.
         SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2017.
 
  * * * * *