Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB81 by Moody (Relating to the civil and criminal penalties for possession of certain small amounts of marihuana and an exception to prosecution for possession of associated drug paraphernalia; creating a criminal offense.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
|Fiscal Year||Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds|
|Fiscal Year||Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
General Revenue Fund
|Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Various General Revenue Dedicated Accounts
|Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Based upon historical records, the Office of Court Administration estimates that in fiscal year 2016 there were 33,773 convictions or orders of deferred adjudication in possession cases involving one ounce or less of marihuana, a Class B misdemeanor. Assuming a similar caseload in future years, the resulting loss in state revenue from the average court costs for a Class B misdemeanor are anticipated to be $115 per case, or $3,883,895 ($115 x 33,773), adjusted by a 40 percent collection rate for Class B misdemeanors (0.40 x $3,883,895), for a total of $1,553,558 each fiscal year in forgone court-cost revenues. Court costs are deposited to numerous state accounts, including General Revenue (4 percent of $115, or $62,142 of $1,553,558); various General Revenue-Dedicated Accounts (78 percent of $115, or $1,211,775 of $1,553,558); and the Judicial Fund No. 573 (18 percent of $115, or $279,640 of $1,553,558).
The table above summarizes the fiscal impact for various General Revenue-Dedicated accounts that would see a revenue loss which include, but are not limited to: the Fair Defense Account, the Criminal Justice Planning Fund, and the Emergency Radio Infrastructure Fund.
This court cost revenue loss would be offset by a maximum $250 civil penalty assessed in those cases were a person was not instead 1) found to be indigent or 2) directed to attend a substance abuse program or performance community service. Assuming 50 percent of the 33,773 expected cases are assessed the maximum civil penalty of $250 would result in an annual revenue gain of $4,221,625. However, for purposes of this analysis, it is assumed judges statewide might assess instead on average a $81.25 civil penalty, which in 33,773 cases equates to $2,744,056. Assuming that 20 percent of persons subject to the penalty instead would be found indigent or given deferred adjudication reduces expected revenue to $2,195,245 (0.80 * $2,744,056).
Assuming 100 percent of civil filing fees are deposited to General Revenue, the bill would result in a net revenue gain to the General Revenue account of $2,133,103 each fiscal year ($2,195,245 - $62,142), offset by revenue losses to other state accounts.
According to the Office of Court Administration, the number of convictions for a defendant's 4th or subsequent conviction cannot be determined; however, the agency does not anticipate this number to be significant. Based on the analysis of the Department of Public Safety, Department of State Health Services, and Juvenile Justice Department, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the remaining provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 405 Department of Public Safety, 537 State Health Services, Department of
UP, KJo, MW, GDz, SD, JPo, LM, JGA, KVe