LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 5, 2017

TO:
Honorable Jane Nelson, Chair, Senate Committee on Finance
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1505 by Hinojosa (relating to the application of certain taxes imposed on certain tobacco products and to the allocation of certain revenue from those taxes to increase funding for certain health care education programs.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1505, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($10,880,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.

Additionally, the bill will have a direct impact of a revenue gain to the Property Tax Relief Fund of $15,220,000 for the 2018-19 biennium.  Any gain to the Property Tax Relief Fund will result in equal amount of savings in General Revenue used to fund the Foundation School Program.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2018 ($4,180,000)
2019 ($6,700,000)
2020 ($6,550,000)
2021 ($6,280,000)
2022 ($6,070,000)




Fiscal Year Probable Revenue (Loss) from
General Revenue Fund
1
Probable Revenue (Loss) from
State Highway Fund
6
Probable Revenue Gain from
Permanent Fnd Supporting Grad Ed
179
Probable Revenue Gain from
Property Tax Relief Fund
304
2018 ($4,180,000) ($2,170,000) $2,200,000 $7,090,000
2019 ($6,700,000) $0 $2,510,000 $8,130,000
2020 ($6,550,000) $0 $2,250,000 $7,260,000
2021 ($6,280,000) $0 $2,490,000 $8,050,000
2022 ($6,070,000) $0 $2,230,000 $7,200,000

Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain from
Nursing Faculty Loan Repayment Assistance Program
Probable (Cost) from
Nursing Faculty Loan Repayment Assitance Program
Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Cities
Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Transit Authorities
2018 $2,410,000 ($2,410,000) ($420,000) ($140,000)
2019 $2,440,000 ($2,440,000) ($470,000) ($160,000)
2020 $2,390,000 ($2,390,000) ($440,000) ($150,000)
2021 $2,380,000 ($2,380,000) ($420,000) ($150,000)
2022 $2,180,000 ($2,180,000) ($400,000) ($140,000)

Fiscal Year Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Counties & Special Districts
2018 ($80,000)
2019 ($90,000)
2020 ($80,000)
2021 ($80,000)
2022 ($70,000)

Fiscal Analysis

This bill would amend the Education and Tax Codes to dedicate certain cigar and tobacco products revenue collections to the existing Permanent Fund Supporting Graduate Education (PFSGE) and the new Nursing Facility Repayment Assistance Program Account (NFRAP) as created by the bill. The bill would define "little cigars" and tax them as cigarettes. The General Revenue Fund portion of any cigarette tax revenue increase resulting from the inclusion of little cigars would be deposited to PFSGE (two-thirds) and the NFRAP account (one-third).
 
NFRAP would be an account in the General Revenue Fund, and money in the account would be appropriated to provide loan repayment assistance to eligible nursing faculty. The bill would direct 2 percent of collections from the portion of cigar and tobacco products taxes above what would be collected if the rate was 40 percent of the manufacturer's list price, not including little cigars, to the NFRAP account.
 
The bill would repeal Sections 61.9823(b) and 61.9826 of the Education Code, which limit nursing faculty loan repayment assistance to $7,000 per year and allow for the allocation of GR Account 5144 - Physician Education Loan Repayment funds exceeding need to the Nursing Faculty Repayment Assistance Program.
 
The bill's provisions would not apply to loan repayment assistance awarded before the 2017-18 academic year.
 
This bill would take effect September 1, 2017.

Methodology

This analysis was based on the 2018-19 Biennial Revenue Estimate. The bill's changes for little cigars would significantly increase their tax rate-from the current 2 or 15 cents per pack to $1.41 per pack-and will result in a reduction in consumption of these products in Texas. Lowered consumption will reduce sales tax collections accruing to the General Revenue Fund, the State Highway Fund, and local jurisdictions. The reclassification of little cigars as cigarettes would result in reduced cigar tax revenue to the General Revenue Fund. However, the reclassification and effective tax rate increase of little cigars will result in increased cigarette tax revenue to the Property Tax Relief Fund, the Permanent Fund Supporting Graduate Medical Education, and the proposed Nursing Faculty Loan Repayment Assistance Program account. Potential revenue collections were adjusted for consumption and tax avoidance effects and for collections lags.

Although the bill does not make an appropriation, this estimate assumes that money deposited to the NFRAP will be used to provide loan repayment assistance to eligible nursing faculty.

Pursuant to Proposition 7 (2015), any sales tax collections in excess of $28 billion and less than
$30.5 billion will be deposited into the State Highway Fund. Because total 2018 collections are
projected to fall in that range, the 2018 revenue loss is from the State Highway Fund instead of
General Revenue.

This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either with or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. Legislative policy, implemented as Government Code 403.095, consolidated special funds (except those affected by constitutional, federal, or other restrictions) into the General Revenue Fund as of August 31, 1993 and eliminated all applicable statutory revenue dedications as of August 31, 1995. Each subsequent Legislature has reviewed bills that affect funds consolidation. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature.

Local Government Impact

There would be a loss of sales and use tax revenue from units of local government.  Estimated losses to cities, transit authorities, counties, and other special districts are displayed in the above tables.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
UP, KK, SD