Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1822 by Burton (Relating to criminal offenses previously compiled in statutes outside the Penal Code, to repealing certain of those offenses, and to conforming punishments for certain of those offenses to the penalty structure provided in the Penal Code; increasing the punishment for sabotage and sedition; imposing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Penal Code to move and revise criminal offenses and associated penalties within the code. The bill would move sections of code addressing the offenses of failure to comply with sex registration requirements, identity theft, pyramid promotional schemes, sabotage, and sedition to the Penal Code. The bill would also revise the penalties associated with several civil and criminal offenses. The bill would add sabotage to the list of felonies that may result in a charge of capital murder and would prohibit some frivolous licensing challenges and complaints.
According to the Office of Court Administration, the change in penalties associated with offenses modified by the bill would not result in a significant change in court costs, fines and fees resulting from these criminal offenses. Additionally, based on the analysis of the Department of Public Safety, Department of Criminal Justice, and Parks and Wildlife Department, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies.
Local Government Impact
The bill modifies certain misdemeanor offenses. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication.
According to the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety, 696 Department of Criminal Justice, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department