LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 21, 2017

TO:
Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB29 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to prostitution and the trafficking of persons, civil racketeering related to trafficking, the prosecution of and punishment for certain sexual offenses and offenses involving or related to trafficking, reimbursement of certain costs for criminal victims who are children, and the release and reporting of certain information relating to a child; increasing a criminal penalty; creating a criminal offense.), As Introduced

The provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses are the subject of this analysis. The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to the offense and punishment of promotion of prostitution and aggravated promotion of prostitution. The bill would enhance the punishment for promotion of prostitution from a Class A Misdemeanor to a state jail felony and enhance the punishment from a state jail to a third degree felony for individuals previously convicted of this offense. The bill would also enhance the punishment for the offense of aggravated promotion of prostitution from a third degree to a second degree felony.

A second degree felony is punishable by confinement in prison for a term from 2 to 20 years; a third degree felony for a term from 2 to 10 years; and a state jail felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail for a term from 180 days to 2 years or Class A Misdemeanor punishment. In addition to confinement, all felony level offenses are subject to an optional fine not to exceed $10,000. A Class A Misdemeanor is punishable by confinement in a county jail for a term not to exceed one year and/or a fine not to exceed $4,000.

Enhancing the penalty for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of supervision in the community or longer terms of confinement in state correctional institutions. In fiscal year 2016, 123 individuals subject to the bill's provisions were arrested, 18 were placed under felony community supervision, and less than 10 were admitted to state correctional facilities. This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions would not result in a significant impact on the demand for state correctional resources.


Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
UP, LM, KJo