BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

C.S.H.B. 101

By: Canales

Criminal Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Substituted)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 

Concerns have been raised over the increase in volume of caller ID spoofing calls that occur when a caller ID display shows a number different from the number under which the call was placed. C.S.H.B. 101 seeks to remedy this situation by creating the offense of false caller identification information display for a person who makes these calls with the intent to defraud, harass, or cause harm.

 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS

 

C.S.H.B. 101 amends the Penal Code to create the Class A misdemeanor offense of false caller identification information display for a person who, with the intent to defraud, harass, or cause harm, makes a call or engages in any other conduct using any type of technology that results in the display on another person's telecommunications device of data that misrepresents the actor's identity or telephone number. The bill prohibits a conviction for the offense from being used for enhancement purposes under any other statutory provision relating to telecommunications crimes and sets out defenses to prosecution for the offense.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE

 

September 1, 2019.

 

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE

 

While C.S.H.B. 101 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following summarizes the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.

 

The substitute does not contain a provision that includes specific types of networks or services a person uses to commit an offense.

 

The substitute changes the exceptions to the application of the offense to make them instead a defense to prosecution of the offense and to revise the list of actors and their actions that are covered by the defense.

 

The substitute includes a definition of "telecommunications service provider."