This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

Senate Research Center

S.B. 1358

 

By: Hancock

 

Business & Commerce

 

5/29/2019

 

Enrolled

 

 

 

AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

 

Under Section 15.024(d) of the Utilities Code, if a person that the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) issues a Notice of Violation against does not respond to the Notice of Violation within twenty days, then PUC considers the person to be in default of the Notice of Violation.

 

Section 15.024(f) requires the executive director of the PUC to set a hearing at the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) even though the person has been non-responsive to the Notice of Violation. After the SOAH hearing, the violation then returns and is decided by the PUC.

 

S.B. 1358 would amend Section 15.024(f) to remove the requirement for an administrative hearing before proceeding to the PUC in situations where a person has failed to respond to the Notice of Violation. This change would allow default violations to move more quickly through the process, providing a faster resolution and saving resources for both the PUC and SOAH.

 

The proposed change is also consistent with the Water Code, and the change would align telecommunications and electric proceedings with the PUC's process in water utility proceedings.

 

Section 15.024 of the Utilities Code sets forth the administrative penalty authority of the PUC for violations of Public Utility Regulatory Act.

 

S.B. 1358 would allow the executive director of the PUC to send a notice of violation by regular mail. Current law already allows notice by certified mail.

 

The bill would set forth the conditions under which notice is deemed to have been received. The person is deemed to have received notice five days after the PUC mails the notice by regular mail or on the date the person receives notice by certified mail or refuses delivery.

 

If a person failed to respond to the notice, the bill would require the executive director to approve the determination of violation and impose the recommended penalty or order a hearing on the determination and the recommended penalty.

 

The bill would amend current law to strike the requirement that the executive director set a hearing when a person has failed to timely respond to a notice of violation. If the PUC commissioners choose to set a hearing, the PUC may refer the case to SOAH.

 

The bill would specify that a hearing at SOAH on a violation of the Public Utility Regulatory Act would be conducted in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act. (Original Author's/Sponsor's Statement of Intent)

 

S.B. 1358 amends current law relating to procedures for imposing certain administrative penalties or disgorgement orders by the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

 

 


 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.

 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1. Amends Section 15.024, Utilities Code, by amending Subsections (b), (e), and (f) and adding Subsection (b-1), as follows:

 

(b) Authorizes the notice given by the executive director of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (executive director; PUC) to a person being assessed a penalty to be given by regular or certified mail, rather than given by certified mail.

 

(b-1) Provides that if the PUC sends written notice to a person by mail addressed to the person's mailing address as maintained in the PUC's records, the person is deemed to have received notice on the fifth day after the date that the PUC sent the written notice, for notice sent by regular mail, or on the date the written notice is received or delivery is refused, for notice sent by certified mail.

 

(e) Requires the PUC by order, if the person accepts the executive director's determination and recommended penalty or fails to timely respond to the notice, to approve the determination and impose the recommended penalty or order a hearing on the determination and the recommended penalty, rather than requiring the PUC by order, if the person accepts the executive director's determination and the recommended penalty, to approve the determination and impose the recommended penalty.

 

(f) Requires the PUC, if the person requires a hearing or the PUC orders a hearing under Subsection (e), to refer the matter to the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) for a hearing and give notice of the referral to the person. Deletes existing text relating to hearings set by the executive director. Requires the hearing to be held by an administrative law judge of SOAH and requires notice of the hearing to be provided in accordance with Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure), Government Code.

 

SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective.

 

SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 2019.