86R9973 JSC-F
 
  By: Guillen H.B. No. 1659
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to conservatorship of a child in certain suits affecting
  the parent-child relationship.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Sections 153.004(b), (d), (e), and (f), Family
  Code, are amended to read as follows:
         (b)  The court may not appoint joint managing conservators if
  clear and convincing [credible] evidence is presented of a history
  or pattern of past or present child neglect, or physical or sexual
  abuse by one parent directed against the other parent, a spouse, or
  a child, including a sexual assault in violation of Section 22.011
  or 22.021, Penal Code, that results in the other parent becoming
  pregnant with the child. A history of sexual abuse includes a
  sexual assault that results in the other parent becoming pregnant
  with the child, regardless of the prior relationship of the
  parents. It is a rebuttable presumption that the appointment of a
  parent as the sole managing conservator of a child or as the
  conservator who has the exclusive right to determine the primary
  residence of a child is not in the best interest of the child if
  clear and convincing [credible] evidence is presented of a history
  or pattern of past or present child neglect, or physical or sexual
  abuse by that parent directed against the other parent, a spouse, or
  a child.
         (d)  The court may not allow a parent to have access to a
  child for whom it is shown by clear and convincing [a preponderance
  of the] evidence that:
               (1)  there is a history or pattern of committing family
  violence during the two years preceding the date of the filing of
  the suit or during the pendency of the suit; or
               (2)  the parent engaged in conduct that constitutes an
  offense under Section 21.02, 22.011, 22.021, or 25.02, Penal Code,
  and that as a direct result of the conduct, the victim of the
  conduct became pregnant with the parent's child.
         (e)  It is a rebuttable presumption that it is not in the best
  interest of a child for a parent to have unsupervised visitation
  with the child if clear and convincing [credible] evidence is
  presented of a history or pattern of past or present child neglect
  or abuse or family violence by:
               (1)  that parent; or
               (2)  any person who resides in that parent's household
  or who is permitted by that parent to have unsupervised access to
  the child during that parent's periods of possession of or access to
  the child.
         (f)  In determining under this section whether there is clear
  and convincing [credible] evidence of a history or pattern of past
  or present child neglect or abuse or family violence by a parent or
  other person, as applicable, the court shall consider whether a
  protective order was rendered under Chapter 85, Title 4, against
  the parent or other person during the two-year period preceding the
  filing of the suit or during the pendency of the suit.
         SECTION 2.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, including a suit
  for modification, pending before a court on or filed on or after the
  effective date of this Act.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.