LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 86TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 21, 2019

TO:
Honorable John Cyrier, Chair, House Committee on Culture, Recreation & Tourism
 
FROM:
John McGeady, Assistant Director     Sarah Keyton, Assistant Director
Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1422 by Paddie (Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Historical Commission.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1422, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($3,394,678) through the biennium ending August 31, 2021.

Provisions of the bill related to the sale and deaccession of curatorial collection items could result in an indeterminate increase of revenue to a new dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2020 ($1,702,839)
2021 ($1,691,839)
2022 ($1,673,839)
2023 ($1,653,839)
2024 ($1,623,839)




Fiscal Year Probable Revenue (Loss) from
Parks and Wildlife Department General Revenue-Dedicated Accounts
Probable Savings from
State Parks Acct
64
Probable Revenue Gain from
General Revenue Fund
1
Probable (Cost) from
General Revenue Fund
1
2020 ($1,296,000) $2,998,839 $1,296,000 ($2,998,839)
2021 ($1,307,000) $2,998,839 $1,307,000 ($2,998,839)
2022 ($1,325,000) $2,998,839 $1,325,000 ($2,998,839)
2023 ($1,345,000) $2,998,839 $1,345,000 ($2,998,839)
2024 ($1,375,000) $2,998,839 $1,375,000 ($2,998,839)

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would continue the Texas Historical Commission (THC) for 12 years, through September 1, 2031. The bill would amend requirements regarding the training of the agency's commission members. The bill would allow the THC to delegate to the executive director the authority to perform the duties or exercise the powers of the commission. The bill would establish the Heritage Trails program in statute and require THC to adopt rules regarding the program. The bill would abolish the Texas Courthouse Preservation Program Advisory Committee and the advisory board associated with the Preservation Trust Fund Account.
 
The bill would transfer six historic sites from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) to THC on September 1, 2019: Fanthorp Inn, Lipantitlan, Monument Hill and Kreische Brewery, Port Isabel Lighthouse, San Jacinto Battleground, and Washington-on-the-Brazos. The bill includes a provision which would allow TPWD to retain legal title to the San Jacinto Battleground if the agency, before September 1, 2019, has applied for a grant for the site for which they are required to possess legal title to the site; the possession of the legal title ceases on the earlier of either the date on which the grant application is denied or September 1, 2021.

The bill would amend the maximum Sporting Goods Sales Tax allocations to the TPWD and THC from 94 percent and 6 percent, respectively, to 93.4 percent and 6.6 percent.
 
The bill would authorize agencies with curatorial collections and an officially adopted deaccession policy to sell deaccessioned items through the State Surplus Property program administered by the Texas Facilities Commission (TFC). Proceeds from the sale of deaccessioned items would be deposited to the credit of a new dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund. Proceeds from a sale would be authorized to be appropriated only to the respective agency from which the deaccessioned item originated and only for the care and preservation of the respective agency's qualifying curatorial collection.
 
This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either within or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature.

Methodology

Based on the analysis of TPWD, the operation of the six historic sites to be transferred to THC is estimated to cost $2,998,840 in each fiscal year out of the General Revenue-Dedicated State Parks Account No. 64 and requires 42.3 full-time-equivalent (FTE) positions. Included within the TPWD's cost from the State Parks Account is $2,189,152 in each fiscal year from Sporting Goods Sales Tax (SGST) allocations.
 
Under Section 151.801 of the Tax Code, as currently written, a maximum of 94 percent of SGST revenues may be appropriated to TPWD and a maximum of 6 percent of the SGST revenues may be appropriated to THC. The bill would amend the maximum allocations to 93.4 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively to TPWD and THC. SGST allocations are appropriated to TPWD for transfer to multiple General Revenue-Dedicated accounts: State Parks Account No. 64, Texas Recreation and Parks Account No. 467, Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Capital Account No. 5004, and the Large County and Municipality Recreation and Parks Account No. 5150. SGST is appropriated to the THC as General Revenue. The amounts reflected as the probable revenue loss to the TPWD dedicated accounts and corresponding gain to the General Revenue Fund reflect the 0.6 percent adjustment to the maximum SGST allocations (ranging from $1,021,000 in fiscal year 2020 to $1,100,000 in fiscal year 2024).
 
Additionally, TPWD and Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates that the affected six historic sites generate approximately $275,000 in each fiscal year, which are currently deposited to the State Parks Account. This analysis assumes that, upon transfer of the historic sites, these revenues would be deposited to the General Revenue Fund for a revenue gain of $275,000 in each fiscal year and a corresponding revenue loss to the State Parks Account.
 
Based on the analysis of the Comptroller, provisions of the bill related to the sale and deaccession of historic property by state agencies could result in an increase of revenue, to be deposited into a new dedicated account in General Revenue, but the amount of increased revenue cannot be estimated.
 
TFC estimates there would be a cost associated with provisions of the bill pertaining to the sale of deaccessioned items through the State Surplus Property program. This analysis assumes the cost could be absorbed within existing resources.

Technology

This analysis does not assume a technology impact.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
116 Sunset Advisory Commission, 356 Texas Ethics Commission, 303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department, 808 Historical Commission
LBB Staff:
WP, LCO, SZ, NV, TBo, JMO