LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 86TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 30, 2019

TO:
Honorable Dustin Burrows, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
 
FROM:
John McGeady, Assistant Director     Sarah Keyton, Assistant Director
Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HJR56 by Bernal (Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to limit the total amount of ad valorem taxes that a school district may impose on the residence homestead of an individual and the surviving spouse of the individual if the individual qualifies the property as the individual's residence homestead for 15 consecutive tax years and the school taxes on the property increase by at least 120 percent during that period.), As Introduced

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated, other than the cost of publication. Any additional fiscal implication would be attributable to the corresponding enabling legislation.

The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $177,289.

The resolution would propose an amendment to Article VIII of the Texas Constitution to permit the Legislature to create a school tax ceiling for individuals who qualify a property as a residence homestead for at least 15 consecutive years and the school district taxes in that 15th tax year are at least 120 percent greater than imposed in the first of those tax years. Property taxes imposed on property improvements during the 15-year period could be excluded from the ceiling. The Legislature would be permitted to allow a qualified surviving spouse to retain the tax ceiling.

Adoption of the proposed constitutional amendment alone would have no fiscal impact on the state or units of local government other than the cost of publication. Any fiscal impact would depend on the corresponding enabling legislation (HB 1102).

The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $177,289.

The proposed amendment would be submitted to voters at an election to be held November 5, 2019.

Local Government Impact

The proposed constitutional amendment alone would have no fiscal implication to units of local government. Any fiscal implication would be attributable to the corresponding enabling legislation.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
WP, KK, SD, SJS