Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM:
John McGeady, Assistant Director Sarah Keyton, Assistant Director Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
SB1164 by Rodríguez (Relating to the disposition of an item bearing a counterfeit trademark seized in connection with a criminal offense.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require a court to order that any item with a counterfeit mark be destroyed or forfeited to the protected mark's owner if the return was requested by the protected mark's owner following the final conviction or placement on deferred adjudication community supervision of a person for the offense of trademark counterfeiting. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council