LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
86TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 29, 2019

TO:
Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
 
FROM:
John McGeady, Assistant Director     Sarah Keyton, Assistant Director
Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1513 by Coleman (Relating to a criminal offense committed against a person because of bias or prejudice on the basis of gender identity or expression.), As Introduced

The provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions are the subject of this analysis.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to the affirmative finding of bias or prejudice. The bill would expand the list of group types against which specific offenses would require a judge to enter an affirmative finding that an actor selected a victim with intentional bias or prejudice because of the victim's membership in the group.  An affirmative finding of this type may be used to enhance the penalty for arson, criminal mischief, graffiti, and all Title Five offenses. In certain circumstances and for certain offenses, under existing statute, an affirmative finding of bias or prejudice will preclude the option of community supervision.

A second degree felony is punishable by confinement in prison for a term from 2 to 20 years and, in addition to confinement, an optional fine not to exceed $10,000.  A third degree felony is punishable by confinement in prison for a term from 2 to 10 years and, in addition to confinement, an optional fine not to exceed $10,000.  A state jail felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail for a term from 180 days to 2 years and, in addition to confinement, an optional fine not to exceed $10,000 or Class A misdemeanor punishment.  A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by confinement in county jail for a term not to exceed one year and, in addition to confinement, an optional fine not to exceed $4,000.

Expanding the list of behaviors for which a criminal penalty may be enhanced is expected to result in additional demands upon the correctional resources of the counties or of the State due to longer terms of supervision in the community or longer terms of confinement within state correctional institutions.  Whether the bill would result in a significant impact on state correctional populations is indeterminate due to a lack of statewide data containing the level of detail necessary to separate cases in which an offense was motivated by bias or prejudice because of an individual's gender identity or expression from all others cases.  In fiscal year 2018, 107,172 persons were arrested, 17,757 were placed onto community supervision, and 10,316 were admitted into state correctional institutions for offenses which would require an affirmative finding of bias or prejudice if, at trial, bias or prejudice was determined to have motivated the offense. 



Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
WP, LM, DGi