This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 2, 2021
TO:
Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB11 by Paddie (Relating to the preparedness for extreme weather emergencies of facilities that provide electricity service; providing an administrative penalty.), As Engrossed
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB11, As Engrossed : a negative impact of ($676,896) through the biennium ending August 31, 2023.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2022
($338,448)
2023
($338,448)
2024
($338,448)
2025
($338,448)
2026
($338,448)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
Fiscal Year
Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2021
2022
($338,448)
2.0
2023
($338,448)
2.0
2024
($338,448)
2.0
2025
($338,448)
2.0
2026
($338,448)
2.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require the PUC to adopt rules relating to power generating and transmission/distribution facilities preparedness to provide service during extreme weather emergencies. The bill would also require the PUC to analyze emergency operations plans developed by ERCOT and prepare a report for submission to the lieutenant governor, speaker of the house, and member of the legislature. The bill would require the PUC to coordinate with utilities to identify certain critical care customers, as well as require the PUC to adopt rules that develop an audit procedure for emergency operations plans. The PUC would also have to determine if the entities submitting the plans can provide service during an emergency and meet NERC reliability standards.
Methodology
The PUC anticipates it would have to hire 2.0 engineers to implement the provisions of this bill. Both engineers would need to be professional engineers (Engineer V), at a cost of $120,000 per employee per year. Other operating costs would total 3,000 and travel would total $10,000 per year. Therefore, the total cost to the State, including indirect benefits costs and technology costs, would be $338,448 each year.
Technology
The PUC cannot absorb the additional technology costs associated with new laptops for 2 additional employees. Each additional laptop on the agency's lease costs $1,900, creating $3,800 in annual technological costs.
Local Government Impact
The PUC anticipates that the bill would have a fiscal impact on municipally-owned utilities.
Source Agencies:
473 Public Utility Commission of Texas, 475 Office of Public Utility Counsel