|
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to civil liability for obscenity. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Title 4, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is |
|
amended by adding Chapter 98C to read as follows: |
|
CHAPTER 98C. LIABILITY FOR OBSCENITY |
|
Sec. 98C.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: |
|
(1) "Harmful material" has the meaning assigned by |
|
Section 43.24, Penal Code. |
|
(2) "Information content provider" and "interactive |
|
computer service" have the meanings assigned by Section 43.01, |
|
Penal Code. |
|
(3) "Minor" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.24, |
|
Penal Code. |
|
(4) "Obscenity" means conduct that constitutes an |
|
offense under Subchapter B, Chapter 43, Penal Code. |
|
Sec. 98C.002. LIABILITY FOR OBSCENITY. A defendant is |
|
liable, as provided by this chapter, to a person harmed for damages |
|
arising from obscenity if the defendant: |
|
(1) engages in the obscenity; or |
|
(2) knowingly or intentionally benefits from |
|
participating in an entity that engages in the obscenity. |
|
Sec. 98C.003. INFORMATION CONTENT PROVIDER AND INTERACTIVE |
|
COMPUTER SERVICE LIABILITY. An information content provider or |
|
interactive computer service is liable, as provided by this |
|
chapter, to a person harmed for damages arising from the |
|
distribution, transmission, or display of harmful material to a |
|
minor if, knowing the character and content of the material, the |
|
provider or service knowingly or intentionally benefits from |
|
participating in the distribution, transmission, or display of |
|
harmful material to a minor by facilitating, aiding, encouraging, |
|
or contributing to the distribution, transmission, or display in a |
|
manner that: |
|
(1) is readily accessible to minors; or |
|
(2) includes a minor's visual image, audio voice, or |
|
participation in any manner. |
|
Sec. 98C.004. SHAREHOLDER AND MEMBER LIABILITY. (a) This |
|
section applies to a legal entity governed by Title 2, 3, or 7, |
|
Business Organizations Code. |
|
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of the Business |
|
Organizations Code, a shareholder or member of a legal entity |
|
described by Subsection (a) that is liable under this chapter is |
|
jointly and severally liable with the entity to the person harmed by |
|
the obscenity if the person demonstrates that the shareholder or |
|
member caused the entity to be used for the purpose of engaging in |
|
obscenity and that the conduct was for the direct personal benefit |
|
of the shareholder or member. |
|
Sec. 98C.005. PROHIBITED DEFENSES. It is not a defense to |
|
liability under this chapter that the defendant: |
|
(1) has been acquitted or has not been prosecuted or |
|
convicted under Subchapter B, Chapter 43, Penal Code; |
|
(2) has been convicted of a different offense or a |
|
different type or class of offense for the conduct that is alleged |
|
to give rise to liability under this chapter; |
|
(3) claims ignorance or mistake of law; |
|
(4) has a belief that the requirements of this chapter |
|
are unconstitutional or were unconstitutional; |
|
(5) relies on any court decision that has been |
|
overruled on appeal or by a subsequent court, even if that court |
|
decision had not been overruled when the defendant engaged in the |
|
conduct that violates this chapter; or |
|
(6) relies on any state or federal court decision that |
|
is not binding on the court in which the action has been brought. |
|
Sec. 98C.006. DAMAGES. (a) A court shall award a claimant |
|
who prevails in an action under this chapter: |
|
(1) actual damages, including damages for mental |
|
anguish even if an injury other than mental anguish is not shown; |
|
(2) court costs; and |
|
(3) reasonable attorney's fees. |
|
(b) In addition to an award under Subsection (a), a claimant |
|
who prevails in an action under this chapter may recover exemplary |
|
damages. |
|
Sec. 98C.007. CAUSE OF ACTION CUMULATIVE. (a) The cause of |
|
action created by this chapter is cumulative of any other remedy |
|
provided by common law or statute. |
|
(b) Each occurrence of obscenity that harms a person, |
|
regardless of whether the occurrence is part of a pattern of |
|
conduct, gives rise to a separate claim for civil liability under |
|
this chapter. |
|
Sec. 98C.008. JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY. A person who |
|
engages in conduct described by Section 98C.002 or 98C.003 and is |
|
found liable under this chapter or other law for any amount of |
|
damages arising from that conduct is jointly and severally liable |
|
with any other defendant for the entire amount of damages arising |
|
from that conduct. |
|
Sec. 98C.009. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATION. (a) |
|
This chapter shall be liberally construed and applied to promote |
|
its underlying purpose to protect persons from obscenity and |
|
provide adequate remedies to those who are harmed by obscenity. |
|
(b) This chapter may not be construed to: |
|
(1) wholly or partly repeal, either expressly or by |
|
implication, any statute or part of a statute that prohibits |
|
obscenity; |
|
(2) restrict a political subdivision from regulating |
|
or prohibiting obscenity in a manner that is at least as stringent |
|
as the laws of this state; or |
|
(3) legalize any conduct prohibited by this chapter or |
|
Subchapter B, Chapter 43, Penal Code. |
|
SECTION 2. (a) Mindful of Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 |
|
(1996), in which in the context of determining the severability of a |
|
state statute the United States Supreme Court held that an explicit |
|
statement of legislative intent is controlling, it is the intent of |
|
the legislature that every provision, section, subsection, |
|
sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this Act, and every |
|
application of the provisions in this Act, are severable from each |
|
other. |
|
(b) If any application of any statutory provision in this |
|
Act to any person, group of persons, or circumstances is found by a |
|
court to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining applications |
|
of that statutory provision to all other persons and circumstances |
|
shall be severed and may not be affected. All constitutionally |
|
valid applications of this Act shall be severed from any |
|
applications that a court finds to be unconstitutional or otherwise |
|
invalid, leaving the valid applications in force, because it is the |
|
legislature's intent and priority that the valid applications be |
|
allowed to stand alone. |
|
(c) Even if a reviewing court finds a substantial number of |
|
a statute's applications under this Act to be unconstitutional, |
|
judged in relation to this Act's plainly legitimate sweep, the |
|
applications that do not presently violate the United States |
|
Constitution or Texas Constitution shall be severed from the |
|
remaining applications and shall remain in force, and shall be |
|
treated as if the legislature had enacted a statute limited to the |
|
persons, groups of persons, or circumstances for which the |
|
statute's application does not violate the United States |
|
Constitution or Texas Constitution. |
|
(d) The legislature further declares that it would have |
|
enacted this Act, and each provision, section, subsection, |
|
sentence, clause, phrase, or word, and all constitutional |
|
applications of this Act, irrespective of the fact that any |
|
provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word, |
|
or applications of this Act, were to be declared unconstitutional. |
|
(e) If any provision of this Act is found by any court to be |
|
unconstitutionally vague, the applications of that provision that |
|
do not present constitutional vagueness problems shall be severed |
|
and remain in force. |
|
(f) No court may decline to enforce the severability |
|
requirements of Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this |
|
section on the ground that severance would rewrite the statute or |
|
involve the court in legislative or lawmaking activity. A court |
|
that declines to enforce or enjoins a state official from enforcing |
|
a statutory provision does not rewrite a statute, as the statute |
|
continues to contain the same words as before the court's decision. |
|
A judicial injunction or declaration of unconstitutionality: |
|
(1) is nothing more than an edict prohibiting |
|
enforcement that may subsequently be vacated by a later court if |
|
that court has a different understanding of the requirements of the |
|
United States Constitution or Texas Constitution; |
|
(2) is not a formal amendment of the language in a |
|
statute; and |
|
(3) no more rewrites a statute than a decision by the |
|
executive not to enforce a duly enacted statute in a limited and |
|
defined set of circumstances. |
|
(g) If any federal or state court declares unconstitutional |
|
or enjoins the enforcement of a provision in this Act and fails to |
|
enforce the severability requirements of Subsections (a), (b), (c), |
|
(d), (e), and (f) of this section, for any reason whatsoever, the |
|
attorney general shall: |
|
(1) adopt rules that enforce the requirements |
|
described by this Act to the maximum possible extent while avoiding |
|
the constitutional problems or other problems identified by the |
|
federal or state court; and |
|
(2) issue notice of those rules, not later than the |
|
30th day after the date of the court ruling. |
|
(h) If the attorney general fails to adopt the rules and |
|
issue notice under Subsection (g) of this section, a person may |
|
petition for a writ of mandamus requiring the attorney general to |
|
adopt the rules and issue notice. |
|
SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
to a cause of action that accrues on or after the effective date of |
|
this Act. |
|
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2023. |