|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to the burden of proof in a trial de novo appeal of the |
|
appraised value of property. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Section 42.23, Property Tax Code, is amended by |
|
adding subsection (i) to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 42.23. SCOPE OF REVIEW. (a) Review is by trial de |
|
novo. The district court shall try all issues of fact and law |
|
raised by the pleadings in the manner applicable to civil suits |
|
generally. |
|
(b) The court may not admit in evidence the fact of prior |
|
action by the appraisal review board or comptroller, except to the |
|
extent necessary to establish its jurisdiction. |
|
(c) Any party is entitled to trial by jury on demand. |
|
(d) Each party to an appeal is considered a party seeking |
|
affirmative relief for the purpose of discovery regarding expert |
|
witnesses under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure if, on or before |
|
the 120th day after the date the appeal is filed, the property |
|
owner: |
|
(1) makes a written offer of settlement; |
|
(2) requests alternative dispute resolution; and |
|
(3) designates, in response to an appropriate written |
|
discovery request, which cause of action under this chapter is the |
|
basis for the appeal. |
|
(e) For purposes of Subsection (d), a property owner may |
|
designate a cause of action under Section 42.25 or 42.26 as the |
|
basis for an appeal, but may not designate a cause of action under |
|
both sections as the basis for the appeal. Discovery regarding a |
|
cause of action that is not specifically designated by the property |
|
owner under Subsection (d) shall be conducted as provided by the |
|
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. A court may not enter an order, |
|
including a protective order under Rule 192.6 of the Texas Rules of |
|
Civil Procedure, that conflicts with Subsection (d). |
|
(f) For purposes of a no-evidence motion for summary |
|
judgment filed by a party to an appeal under this chapter, the offer |
|
of evidence, including an affidavit or testimony, by any person, |
|
including the appraisal district, the property owner, or the |
|
owner's agent, that was presented at the hearing on the protest |
|
before the appraisal review board constitutes sufficient evidence |
|
to deny the motion. |
|
(g) For the sole purpose of admitting expert testimony to |
|
determine the value of chemical processing property or utility |
|
property in an appeal brought under this chapter and for no other |
|
purpose under this title, including the rendition of property under |
|
Chapter 22, the property is considered to be personal property. |
|
(h) Evidence, argument, or other testimony offered at an |
|
appraisal review board hearing by a property owner or agent is not |
|
admissible in an appeal under this chapter unless: |
|
(1) the evidence, argument, or other testimony is |
|
offered to demonstrate that there is sufficient evidence to deny a |
|
no-evidence motion for summary judgment filed by a party to the |
|
appeal or is necessary for the determination of the merits of a |
|
motion for summary judgment filed on another ground; |
|
(2) the property owner or agent is designated as a |
|
witness for purposes of trial and the testimony offered at the |
|
appraisal review board hearing is offered for impeachment purposes; |
|
or |
|
(3) the evidence is the plaintiff's testimony at the |
|
appraisal review board hearing as to the value of the property. |
|
(i) In a trial de novo appeal brought under this Chapter |
|
involving circumstances described in either Section 23.01(e) or |
|
41.43(a-3) the burden of proof is on the chief appraiser and the |
|
appraisal district to support an increase in the appraised value of |
|
property as provided in sections 23.01(e) or 41.43(a-3), whichever |
|
is applicable. |
|
SECTION 2. Section 23.01(e), Property Tax Code, is amended |
|
to read as follows: |
|
(e) Notwithstanding any provision of this subchapter to the |
|
contrary, if the appraised value of property in a tax year is |
|
lowered under Subtitle F, the appraised value of the property as |
|
finally determined under that subtitle is considered to be the |
|
appraised value of the property for that tax year. In the next tax |
|
year in which the property is appraised, the chief appraiser or |
|
appraisal review board may not increase the appraised value of the |
|
property unless the increase by the chief appraiser is reasonably |
|
supported by clear and convincing evidence when all of the reliable |
|
and probative evidence in the record is considered as a whole. If |
|
the appraised value is finally determined in a protest under |
|
Section 41.41(a)(2) or an appeal under Section 42.26, the chief |
|
appraiser may satisfy the requirement to reasonably support by |
|
clear and convincing evidence an increase in the appraised value of |
|
the property in the next tax year in which the property is appraised |
|
by presenting evidence showing that the inequality in the appraisal |
|
of property has been corrected with regard to the properties that |
|
were considered in determining the value of the subject property. |
|
The burden of proof is on the chief appraiser to support an increase |
|
in the appraised value of property under the circumstances |
|
described by this subsection. |
|
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act takes effect |
|
immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members |
|
elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas |
|
Constitution. If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for |
|
immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2023. |