|
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to postconviction applications for a writ of habeas |
|
corpus. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Article 1.051(d), Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
(d) An eligible indigent defendant is entitled to have the |
|
trial court appoint an attorney to represent the defendant [him] in |
|
the following appellate and postconviction habeas corpus matters: |
|
(1) an appeal to a court of appeals; |
|
(2) an appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals if the |
|
appeal is made directly from the trial court or if a petition for |
|
discretionary review has been granted; |
|
(3) a habeas corpus proceeding if: |
|
(A) the defendant raises a claim governed by |
|
Article 11.073; or |
|
(B) the court concludes that the interests of |
|
justice require representation; and |
|
(4) any other appellate proceeding if the court |
|
concludes that the interests of justice require representation. |
|
SECTION 2. Section 5, Article 11.07, Code of Criminal |
|
Procedure, is amended to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 5. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), the [The] |
|
Court of Criminal Appeals may deny relief upon the findings and |
|
conclusions of the hearing judge without docketing the cause, or |
|
may direct that the cause be docketed and heard as though originally |
|
presented to said court or as an appeal. Upon reviewing the record |
|
the court shall enter its judgment remanding the applicant to |
|
custody or ordering the applicant's [his] release, as the law and |
|
facts may justify. The mandate of the court shall issue to the |
|
court issuing the writ, as in other criminal cases. After |
|
conviction the procedure outlined in this article [Act] shall be |
|
exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and |
|
effect in discharging the prisoner. |
|
(b) The court of criminal appeals may not deny relief on a |
|
claim governed by Article 11.073 except by a written decision |
|
addressing the merits of the claim. |
|
SECTION 3. Section 5, Article 11.071, Code of Criminal |
|
Procedure, is amended by adding Subsection (g) to read as follows: |
|
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, |
|
the court of criminal appeals may consider a subsequent application |
|
that fails to satisfy the requirements of Subsection (a) if the |
|
court finds that justice requires the court to consider the |
|
application. If the court of criminal appeals makes the finding |
|
described by this subsection, the convicting court may take further |
|
action on the application. If the court of criminal appeals does |
|
not make the finding described by this subsection, the court shall |
|
issue an order dismissing the application as an abuse of the writ |
|
under this section. |
|
SECTION 4. Section 6(b-1), Article 11.071, Code of Criminal |
|
Procedure, is amended to read as follows: |
|
(b-1) If the convicting court receives notice that the |
|
requirements of Section 5 [5(a)] for consideration of a subsequent |
|
application have been met and if the applicant has not elected to |
|
proceed pro se and is not represented by retained counsel, the |
|
convicting court shall appoint, in order of priority: |
|
(1) the attorney who represented the applicant in the |
|
proceedings under Section 5, if the attorney seeks the appointment; |
|
(2) the office of capital and forensic writs, if the |
|
office represented the applicant in the proceedings under Section 5 |
|
or otherwise accepts the appointment; or |
|
(3) counsel from a list of competent counsel |
|
maintained by the presiding judges of the administrative judicial |
|
regions under Section 78.056, Government Code, if the office of |
|
capital and forensic writs: |
|
(A) did not represent the applicant as described |
|
by Subdivision (2); or |
|
(B) does not accept or is prohibited from |
|
accepting the appointment under Section 78.054, Government Code. |
|
SECTION 5. Article 11.073, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
Art. 11.073. PROCEDURE RELATED TO CERTAIN SCIENTIFIC |
|
EVIDENCE. (a) This article applies to relevant scientific |
|
evidence that: |
|
(1) was not reasonably available to be offered by a |
|
convicted person at the convicted person's trial; or |
|
(2) contradicts or tends to negate scientific evidence |
|
relied on by the state at trial. |
|
(b) A court may grant a convicted person relief on an |
|
application for a writ of habeas corpus if: |
|
(1) the convicted person files an application, in the |
|
manner provided by Article 11.07, 11.071, or 11.072, containing |
|
specific facts indicating that: |
|
(A) relevant scientific evidence is currently |
|
available and was not available at the time of the convicted |
|
person's trial because the evidence was not ascertainable through |
|
the exercise of reasonable diligence by the convicted person before |
|
the date of or during the convicted person's trial; and |
|
(B) the scientific evidence would be admissible |
|
under the Texas Rules of Evidence at a trial held on the date of the |
|
application; and |
|
(2) the court makes the findings described by |
|
Subdivisions (1)(A) and (B) and also finds that, had the scientific |
|
evidence been presented at trial, there is a reasonable likelihood |
|
the scientific evidence could have affected the person's conviction |
|
or the sentence imposed [on the preponderance of the evidence the |
|
person would not have been convicted]. |
|
(c) [For purposes of] Section 4(a)(1), Article 11.07, |
|
Section 5(a)(1), Article 11.071, and Section 9(a), Article 11.072, |
|
apply to a claim governed by this article only if the claim has been |
|
previously presented in an application filed by an attorney [or |
|
issue could not have been presented previously in an original |
|
application or in a previously considered application if the claim |
|
or issue is based on relevant scientific evidence that was not |
|
ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence by the |
|
convicted person on or before the date on which the original |
|
application or a previously considered application, as applicable, |
|
was filed]. |
|
(d) In making a finding as to whether relevant scientific |
|
evidence was not ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable |
|
diligence [on or] before the [a specific] date of or during the |
|
convicted person's trial, the court shall consider whether the |
|
field of scientific knowledge, a testifying expert's scientific |
|
knowledge, or a scientific method on which the relevant scientific |
|
evidence is based has changed since [: |
|
[(1)] the applicable trial date or dates [, for a |
|
determination made with respect to an original application; or |
|
[(2) the date on which the original application or a |
|
previously considered application, as applicable, was filed, for a |
|
determination made with respect to a subsequent application]. |
|
SECTION 6. Chapter 11, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
amended by adding Article 11.66 to read as follows: |
|
Art. 11.66. WRIT TO INVOKE DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION FOR |
|
PURPOSE OF OBTAINING RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FOR POSTCONVICTION WRIT OF |
|
HABEAS CORPUS APPLICATION. (a) A person may file a writ under this |
|
article in a district court for the purpose of invoking the court's |
|
jurisdiction to obtain documents described by Subsection (b)(2)(B) |
|
related to filing an application for a writ of habeas corpus under |
|
this chapter. |
|
(b) A person may file a petition for a writ under this |
|
article only if: |
|
(1) the person is an attorney licensed in this state; |
|
(2) the person affirms in the petition that: |
|
(A) the person is seeking to file an application |
|
for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of an applicant after a final |
|
conviction; and |
|
(B) the person cannot in good faith file the |
|
application until the person obtains documents relevant to a ground |
|
for relief in the application; and |
|
(3) the person provides the office of the attorney |
|
representing the state in the applicant's case with reasonable |
|
notice of the person's intention to file a petition for a writ under |
|
this article. |
|
(c) A district court's jurisdiction under this article is |
|
limited only to matters relating to: |
|
(1) a petition for a writ under this article; and |
|
(2) the issuance of documents requested by the |
|
petition for a writ under this article. |
|
SECTION 7. Section 24.011, Government Code, is amended to |
|
read as follows: |
|
Sec. 24.011. WRIT POWER. A judge of a district court may, |
|
either in termtime or vacation, grant a writ [writs] of mandamus, |
|
injunction, sequestration, attachment, garnishment, certiorari, |
|
and supersedeas, a writ to issue documents under Article 11.66, |
|
Code of Criminal Procedure, and any [all] other writ [writs] |
|
necessary to the enforcement of the court's jurisdiction. |
|
SECTION 8. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to |
|
an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed on or after the |
|
effective date of this Act. An application filed before the |
|
effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the |
|
date the application was filed, and the former law is continued in |
|
effect for that purpose. |
|
SECTION 9. This Act takes effect December 1, 2025. |