89R17419 JRR-D
 
  By: Cook H.B. No. 115
 
  Substitute the following for H.B. No. 115:
 
  By:  Cook C.S.H.B. No. 115
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to postconviction applications for a writ of habeas
  corpus.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Article 1.051(d), Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended to read as follows:
         (d)  An eligible indigent defendant is entitled to have the
  trial court appoint an attorney to represent the defendant [him] in
  the following appellate and postconviction habeas corpus matters:
               (1)  an appeal to a court of appeals;
               (2)  an appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals if the
  appeal is made directly from the trial court or if a petition for
  discretionary review has been granted;
               (3)  a habeas corpus proceeding if:
                     (A)  the defendant raises a claim governed by
  Article 11.073; or
                     (B)  the court concludes that the interests of
  justice require representation; and
               (4)  any other appellate proceeding if the court
  concludes that the interests of justice require representation.
         SECTION 2.  Section 5, Article 11.07, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
         Sec. 5.  (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), the [The]
  Court of Criminal Appeals may deny relief upon the findings and
  conclusions of the hearing judge without docketing the cause, or
  may direct that the cause be docketed and heard as though originally
  presented to said court or as an appeal. Upon reviewing the record
  the court shall enter its judgment remanding the applicant to
  custody or ordering the applicant's [his] release, as the law and
  facts may justify. The mandate of the court shall issue to the
  court issuing the writ, as in other criminal cases. After
  conviction the procedure outlined in this article [Act] shall be
  exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and
  effect in discharging the prisoner.
         (b)  The court of criminal appeals may not deny relief on a
  claim governed by Article 11.073 except by a written decision
  addressing the merits of the claim.
         SECTION 3.  Section 5, Article 11.071, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended by adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:
         (g)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,
  the court of criminal appeals may consider a subsequent application
  that fails to satisfy the requirements of Subsection (a) if the
  court finds that justice requires the court to consider the
  application. If the court of criminal appeals makes the finding
  described by this subsection, the convicting court may take further
  action on the application. If the court of criminal appeals does
  not make the finding described by this subsection, the court shall
  issue an order dismissing the application as an abuse of the writ
  under this section.
         SECTION 4.  Section 6(b-1), Article 11.071, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
         (b-1)  If the convicting court receives notice that the
  requirements of Section 5 [5(a)] for consideration of a subsequent
  application have been met and if the applicant has not elected to
  proceed pro se and is not represented by retained counsel, the
  convicting court shall appoint, in order of priority:
               (1)  the attorney who represented the applicant in the
  proceedings under Section 5, if the attorney seeks the appointment;
               (2)  the office of capital and forensic writs, if the
  office represented the applicant in the proceedings under Section 5
  or otherwise accepts the appointment; or
               (3)  counsel from a list of competent counsel
  maintained by the presiding judges of the administrative judicial
  regions under Section 78.056, Government Code, if the office of
  capital and forensic writs:
                     (A)  did not represent the applicant as described
  by Subdivision (2); or
                     (B)  does not accept or is prohibited from
  accepting the appointment under Section 78.054, Government Code.
         SECTION 5.  Article 11.073, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended to read as follows:
         Art. 11.073.  PROCEDURE RELATED TO CERTAIN SCIENTIFIC
  EVIDENCE. (a)  This article applies to relevant scientific
  evidence that:
               (1)  was not reasonably available to be offered by a
  convicted person at the convicted person's trial; or
               (2)  contradicts or tends to negate scientific evidence
  relied on by the state at trial.
         (b)  A court may grant a convicted person relief on an
  application for a writ of habeas corpus if:
               (1)  the convicted person files an application, in the
  manner provided by Article 11.07, 11.071, or 11.072, containing
  specific facts indicating that:
                     (A)  relevant scientific evidence is currently
  available and was not available at the time of the convicted
  person's trial because the evidence was not ascertainable through
  the exercise of reasonable diligence by the convicted person before
  the date of or during the convicted person's trial; and
                     (B)  the scientific evidence would be admissible
  under the Texas Rules of Evidence at a trial held on the date of the
  application; and
               (2)  the court makes the findings described by
  Subdivisions (1)(A) and (B) and also finds that, had the scientific
  evidence been presented at trial, there is a reasonable likelihood
  the scientific evidence could have affected the person's conviction
  or the sentence imposed [on the preponderance of the evidence the
  person would not have been convicted].
         (c)  [For purposes of] Section 4(a)(1), Article 11.07,
  Section 5(a)(1), Article 11.071, and Section 9(a), Article 11.072,
  apply to a claim governed by this article only if the claim has been
  previously presented in an application filed by an attorney [or
  issue could not have been presented previously in an original
  application or in a previously considered application if the claim
  or issue is based on relevant scientific evidence that was not
  ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence by the
  convicted person on or before the date on which the original
  application or a previously considered application, as applicable,
  was filed].
         (d)  In making a finding as to whether relevant scientific
  evidence was not ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable
  diligence [on or] before the [a specific] date of or during the
  convicted person's trial, the court shall consider whether the
  field of scientific knowledge, a testifying expert's scientific
  knowledge, or a scientific method on which the relevant scientific
  evidence is based has changed since [:
               [(1)]  the applicable trial date or dates [, for a
  determination made with respect to an original application; or
               [(2)  the date on which the original application or a
  previously considered application, as applicable, was filed, for a
  determination made with respect to a subsequent application].
         SECTION 6.  Chapter 11, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by adding Article 11.66 to read as follows:
         Art. 11.66.  WRIT TO INVOKE DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION FOR
  PURPOSE OF OBTAINING RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FOR POSTCONVICTION WRIT OF
  HABEAS CORPUS APPLICATION. (a)  A person may file a writ under this
  article in a district court for the purpose of invoking the court's
  jurisdiction to obtain documents described by Subsection (b)(2)(B)
  related to filing an application for a writ of habeas corpus under
  this chapter.
         (b)  A person may file a petition for a writ under this
  article only if:
               (1)  the person is an attorney licensed in this state;
               (2)  the person affirms in the petition that:
                     (A)  the person is seeking to file an application
  for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of an applicant after a final
  conviction; and
                     (B)  the person cannot in good faith file the
  application until the person obtains documents relevant to a ground
  for relief in the application; and
               (3)  the person provides the office of the attorney
  representing the state in the applicant's case with reasonable
  notice of the person's intention to file a petition for a writ under
  this article.
         (c)  A district court's jurisdiction under this article is
  limited only to matters relating to:
               (1)  a petition for a writ under this article; and
               (2)  the issuance of documents requested by the
  petition for a writ under this article.
         SECTION 7.  Section 24.011, Government Code, is amended to
  read as follows:
         Sec. 24.011.  WRIT POWER. A judge of a district court may,
  either in termtime or vacation, grant a writ [writs] of mandamus,
  injunction, sequestration, attachment, garnishment, certiorari,
  and supersedeas, a writ to issue documents under Article 11.66,
  Code of Criminal Procedure, and any [all] other writ [writs]
  necessary to the enforcement of the court's jurisdiction.
         SECTION 8.  The changes in law made by this Act apply only to
  an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed on or after the
  effective date of this Act.  An application filed before the
  effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the
  date the application was filed, and the former law is continued in
  effect for that purpose.
         SECTION 9.  This Act takes effect December 1, 2025.