By: Toth H.B. No. 2258
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  imposing private civil liability on anyone who causes or
  contributes to the social transitioning of a minor.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  This Act shall be known as the Vulnerable Youth
  Protection Act.
         SECTION 2.  Chapter 161, Health and Safety Code, is amended
  by adding Subchapter Y to read as follows:
  SUBCHAPTER Y. VULNERABLE YOUTH PROTECTION ACT
         Sec. 161.711.  DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:
               (1)  "Castration, sterilization, or mutilation of a
  minor" means any of the procedures or treatments prohibited in
  Subchapter X, Chapter 161, Health and Safety Code, regardless of
  who performs or provides those procedures or treatments.  It does
  not include any of the conduct described in Section 161.703, Health
  and Safety Code.
               (2)  "Social transitioning" means any act by which a
  minor child adopts or espouses a gender identity that differs from
  the child's biological sex as determined by the sex organs,
  chromosomes, and endogenous profiles of the child.  This can
  include but is not limited to changes in clothing, pronouns,
  hairstyle, and name.
         Sec. 161.712.  CAUSING OR CONTRIBUTING TO THE TRANSITIONING
  OF A MINOR. (a)  Any person who causes or contributes to:
               (1)  The social transitioning of a minor; or
               (2)  The castration, sterilization, or mutilation of a
  minor,
         shall be strictly, absolutely, and jointly and severally
  liable to the child and the child's parents for any personal
  injuries or harm resulting from the conduct described in this
  subsection, PROVIDED, that no person may be held liable under this
  section for speech or conduct protected by the First Amendment of
  the United States Constitution, as made applicable to the states
  through the Supreme Court of the United States' interpretations of
  the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or by
  Article 1, § 8 of the Texas State Constitution.
         (b)  A person who prevails in a suit brought under this
  section shall be entitled to recover:
               (1)  nominal damages;
               (2)  compensatory damages;
               (3)  statutory damages in an amount of not less than
  $10,000.00 from each defendant, in addition to any compensatory
  damages that may be awarded; and
               (4)  punitive damages in an amount of not less than
  $10,000,000.00 from each defendant if irreversible sterilization
  or sexual dysfunction results, in addition to any compensatory
  damages that may be awarded; and
               (5)  costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
         (c)  Notwithstanding any other law, a person may bring an
  action under this section not later than the 20th anniversary of the
  date the cause of action accrues.
         (d)  Notwithstanding any other law, the following are not a
  defense to an action brought under this section:
               (1)  ignorance or mistake of law;
               (2)  a defendant's belief that the requirements or
  provisions of this subchapter are unconstitutional or were
  unconstitutional;
               (3)  a defendant's reliance on any court decision that
  has been vacated, reversed, or overruled on appeal or by a
  subsequent court, even if that court decision had not been vacated,
  reversed, or overruled when the conduct described in subsection
  (a) occurred;
               (4)  a defendant's reliance on any state or federal
  court decision that is not binding on the court in which the action
  has been brought;
               (5)  a defendant's reliance on any federal statute,
  agency rule or action, or treaty that has been repealed,
  superseded, or declared invalid or unconstitutional, even if that
  federal statute, agency rule or action, or treaty had not been
  repealed, superseded, or declared invalid or unconstitutional when
  the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred;
               (6)  non-mutual issue preclusion or non-mutual claim
  preclusion;
               (7)  the consent of the plaintiff to the defendant's
  conduct;
               (8)  contributory or comparative negligence;
               (9)  assumption of risk;
               (10)  lack of but-for or proximate causation;
               (11)  sovereign immunity, governmental immunity,
  official immunity, or qualified immunity;
               (12)  the plaintiff's waiver or purported waiver of
  their right to sue under this section;
               (13)  the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative
  remedies; or
               (14)  any claim that the enforcement of this subchapter
  or the imposition of civil liability against the defendant will
  violate the constitutional rights of third parties, except as
  provided by Subsection (h).
         (e)  Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 17,
  Civil Practice and Remedies Code, the courts of this state shall
  have personal jurisdiction over any defendant sued under this
  section to the maximum extent permitted by the Fourteenth Amendment
  to the United States Constitution.
         (f)  Notwithstanding any other law, the law of Texas shall
  apply to any gender-transitioning treatment provided to a resident
  or citizen of Texas, regardless of where that treatment occurred,
  and to any civil action brought under this Section, to the maximum
  extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States and the
  Constitution of Texas.  Any contractual choice-of-law provision
  that purports to require the law of a different jurisdiction to
  apply shall be void as against public policy, and may not be
  enforced in any state or federal court.  This section shall apply
  extraterritorially to the maximum extent permitted by the
  Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Texas.
         (g)  A civil action under this section may not be brought
  against any person that acted at the behest of federal agencies,
  contractors, or employees that are carrying out duties under
  federal law, if the imposition of liability upon that person would
  violate the doctrines of preemption or intergovernmental immunity.
         (h)  A defendant against whom an action is brought under this
  section may assert an affirmative defense to liability under this
  subsection if:
               (1)  the imposition of liability on the defendant will
  violate constitutional or federally protected rights that belong to
  the defendant personally; or
               (2)  the defendant
                     (A)  has standing to assert the rights of a third
  party under the tests for third-party standing established by the
  Supreme Court of the United States; and
                     (B)  demonstrates that the imposition of
  liability on the defendant will violate constitutional or federally
  protected rights belonging to that third party.
         (i)  Nothing in this section or subchapter shall limit or
  preclude a defendant from asserting the unconstitutionality of any
  provision or application of Texas law as a defense to liability
  under this section, or from asserting any other defense that might
  be available under any other source of law.
         (j)  Notwithstanding any other law, this section shall be
  enforced exclusively through the private civil actions described in
  Subsections (a) and (b).  No direct or indirect enforcement of this
  section may be taken or threatened by the state, a political
  subdivision, a district or county attorney, or any officer or
  employee of this state or a political subdivision against any
  person or entity, by any means whatsoever, and the conduct
  described in Subsection (a) may not be used to justify or trigger
  the enforcement of any other law or any type of adverse consequence
  under any other law, except through the private civil actions
  described in Subsections (a) and (b).  This section does not
  preclude or limit the enforcement of any other law or regulation
  against conduct that is independently prohibited by such other law
  or regulation, and that would remain prohibited by such other law or
  regulation in the absence of this section.
         (k)  Notwithstanding any other law, neither the state, nor
  any of its political subdivisions, nor any district or county
  attorney, nor any officer or employee of this state or a political
  subdivision may:
               (1)  act in concert or participation with anyone who
  brings suit under this section;
               (2)  establish or attempt to establish any type of
  agency or fiduciary relationship with a person who brings suit
  under this section;
               (3)  make any attempt to control or influence a person's
  decision to bring suit under this section or that person's conduct
  of the litigation; or
               (4)  intervene in any action brought under this
  section.
         This subsection does not prohibit a person or entity
  described by this subsection from filing an amicus curiae brief in
  the action, so long as that person or entity does not act in concert
  or participation with the plaintiff or plaintiffs who sue under
  this section or violate any provision of Subsection (k)(1)-(4).
         (l)  Notwithstanding any other law, a civil action under this
  section shall not be subject to any provision of Chapter 27, Civil
  Practice and Remedies Code, or Chapter 110, Civil Practice and
  Remedies Code.
         (m)  Notwithstanding any other law, including Rule 42 of the
  Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, a civil action under this section
  may not be litigated on behalf of a plaintiff class or a defendant
  class, and no court may certify a class under Rule 42 of the Texas
  Rules of Civil Procedure in any civil action brought under this
  section.
         (n)  Any waiver or purported waiver of the right to sue under
  this section shall be void as against public policy, and shall not
  be enforceable in any court.
 
         Sec. 161.713.  IMMUNITY FROM SUIT AND LIMITS ON STATE-COURT
  JURISDICTION. (a)  Notwithstanding any other law, the state and
  each of its officers and employees shall have sovereign immunity,
  its political subdivisions and each of their officers and employees
  shall have governmental immunity, and each officer and employee of
  this state or a political subdivision shall have official immunity
  (as well as sovereign or governmental immunity, as appropriate) in
  any action, claim, counterclaim, or any type of legal or equitable
  action that challenges the validity or enforceability of any
  provision or application of this subchapter, on constitutional
  grounds or otherwise, or that seeks to prevent or enjoin the state,
  its political subdivisions, or any officer, employee, or agent of
  this state or a political subdivision from enforcing any provision
  or application of this subchapter, or from hearing, adjudicating,
  or docketing a civil action brought under Section 161.712, unless
  that immunity has been abrogated or preempted by federal law in a
  manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States. The
  sovereign immunity conferred by this section upon the state and
  each of its officers and employees includes the constitutional
  sovereign immunity recognized by the Supreme Court of the United
  States in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996),
  and Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999), which applies in both
  state and federal court and which may not be abrogated by Congress
  or by any state or federal court except pursuant to congressional
  legislation authorized by section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, by
  the Bankruptcy Clause of Article I, or by Congress's powers to raise
  and support Armies and to provide and maintain a Navy, or by any
  other ground that might be recognized by the Supreme Court of the
  United States.
         (b)  Notwithstanding any other law, the immunities conferred
  by Subsection (a) shall apply in every court, both state and
  federal, and in every adjudicative proceeding of any type
  whatsoever.
         (c)  Notwithstanding any other law, no provision of state law
  may be construed to waive or abrogate an immunity described in
  Subsection (a) unless it expressly waives or abrogates immunity
  with specific reference to this section.
         (d)  Notwithstanding any other law, no attorney representing
  the state, its political subdivisions, or any officer, employee, or
  agent of this state or a political subdivision is authorized or
  permitted to waive an immunity described in Subsection (a) or take
  any action that would result in a waiver of that immunity, and any
  such action or purported waiver shall be regarded as a legal nullity
  and an ultra vires act.
         (e)  Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 37,
  Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and sections 22.002, 22.221, and
  24.007 through 24.011, Government Code, no court of this state may
  award declaratory or injunctive relief, or any type of stay or writ,
  including a writ of prohibition, that would pronounce any
  provision or application of this subchapter invalid or
  unconstitutional, or that would restrain or prevent the state, its
  political subdivisions, any officer, employee, or agent of this
  state or a political subdivision, or any person from enforcing any
  provision or application of this subchapter, or from hearing,
  adjudicating, docketing, or filing a civil action brought under
  Section 161.712, and no court of this state shall have jurisdiction
  to consider any action, claim, or counterclaim that seeks such
  relief, and no such action, claim, or counterclaim may be litigated
  on behalf of a plaintiff or defendant class, notwithstanding Rule
  42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and no court may certify a
  plaintiff or defendant class in any action seeking the relief
  described in this Subsection.
         (f)  Nothing in this section or subchapter shall be construed
  to prevent a litigant from asserting the invalidity or
  unconstitutionality of any provision or application of this
  subchapter as a defense to any action, claim, or counterclaim
  brought against that litigant.
         Sec. 161.714.  SEVERABILITY. (a)  Mindful of Leavitt v.
  Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which in the context of determining , 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which in the context of determining
  the severability of a state statute the Supreme Court of the United
  States held that an explicit statement of legislative intent is
  controlling, it is the intent of the legislature that every
  provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
  in this subchapter, and every application of the provisions in this
  subchapter to every person, group of persons, or circumstances,
  are severable from each other.
         (b)  If any application of any provision in this subchapter
  to any person, group of persons, or circumstances is found by a
  court to be invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, for any reason
  whatsoever, then the remaining applications of that provision to
  all other persons and circumstances shall be severed and preserved,
  and shall remain in effect. All constitutionally valid applications
  of the provisions in this subchapter shall be severed from any
  applications that a court finds to be invalid, preempted, or
  unconstitutional, because it is the legislature's intent and
  priority that every single valid application of every statutory
  provision be allowed to stand alone.
         (c)  The legislature further declares that it would have
  enacted this subchapter, and each provision, section, subsection,
  sentence, clause, phrase, or word, and all constitutional
  applications of the provisions of this subchapter, irrespective of
  the fact that any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause,
  phrase, or word, or applications of this subchapter were to be
  declared invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional.
         (d)  If any provision of this subchapter is found by any
  court to be unconstitutionally vague, then the applications of that
  provision that do not present constitutional vagueness problems
  shall be severed and remain in force, consistent with the
  severability requirements of Subsections (a), (b), and (c).
         (e)  No court may decline to enforce the severability
  requirements of Subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) on the ground 
  that severance would "rewrite" the statute or involve the court in
  legislative or lawmaking activity.  A court that declines to
  enforce or enjoins a state official from enforcing a statutory
  provision is never rewriting a statute or engaging in legislative
  or lawmaking activity, as the statute continues to contain the same
  words as before the court's decision.  A judicial injunction or
  declaration of unconstitutionality:
               (1)  is nothing more than an edict prohibiting
  enforcement of the disputed statute against the named parties to
  that lawsuit, which may subsequently be vacated by a later court if
  that court has a different understanding of the requirements of the
  Texas Constitution or United States Constitution;
               (2)  is not a formal amendment of the language in a
  statute; and
               (3)  no more rewrites a statute than a decision by the
  executive not to enforce a duly enacted statute in a limited and
  defined set of circumstances.
         (f)  If any state or federal court disregards any of the
  severability requirements in Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), or
  (e), and declares or finds any provision of this subchapter
  facially invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, when there are
  discrete applications of that provision can be enforced against a
  person, group of persons, or circumstances without violating
  federal law or the federal or state constitutions, then that
  provision shall be interpreted, as a matter of state law, as if the
  legislature had enacted a provision limited to the persons, group
  of persons, or circumstances for which the provision's application
  will not violate federal law or the federal or state constitutions,
  and every court and every state official shall adopt this saving
  construction of that provision until the court ruling that
  pronounced the provision facially invalid, preempted, or
  unconstitutional is vacated or overruled.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2025.