89R15342 MM-D
 
  By: Reynolds H.B. No. 4997
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the tenure and employment of faculty members at certain
  public institutions of higher education.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  The heading to Section 51.942, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         Sec. 51.942.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY
  [TENURE].
         SECTION 2.  Section 51.942(a)(1), Education Code, is amended
  to read as follows:
               (1)  "Governing board" has [and "university system"
  have] the meaning [meanings] assigned by Section 61.003.
         SECTION 3.  Section 51.942, Education Code, is amended by
  amending Subsections (b), (c), (c-1), (c-2), and (c-3) and adding
  Subsection (d) to read as follows:
         (b)  [Only an institution of higher education's governing
  board, on the recommendation of the institution's chief executive
  officer and the university system's chancellor, if applicable, may
  grant tenure.
         [(c)  The granting of tenure may not be construed to create a
  property interest in any attribute of a faculty position beyond a
  faculty member's continuing employment, including his or her
  regular annual salary and any privileges incident to his or her
  status as a tenured professor.
         [(c-1)]  Each governing board of an institution of higher
  education shall adopt policies and procedures providing [regarding
  tenure.  The policies and procedures must:
               [(1)  address the granting of tenure;
               [(2)  allow for the dismissal of a tenured faculty
  member at any time after providing the faculty member with
  appropriate due process, on a determination that:
                     [(A)  the faculty member has:
                           [(i)  exhibited professional incompetence;
                           [(ii)  continually or repeatedly failed to
  perform duties or meet professional responsibilities of the faculty
  member's position;
                           [(iii)  failed to successfully complete any
  post-tenure review professional development program;
                           [(iv)  engaged in conduct involving moral
  turpitude that adversely affects the institution or the faculty
  member's performance of duties or meeting of responsibilities;
                           [(v)  violated laws or university system or
  institution policies substantially related to the performance of
  the faculty member's duties;
                           [(vi)  been convicted of a crime affecting
  the fitness of the faculty member to engage in teaching, research,
  service, outreach, or administration;
                           [(vii)  engaged in unprofessional conduct
  that adversely affects the institution or the faculty member's
  performance of duties or meeting of responsibilities; or
                           [(viii)  falsified the faculty member's
  academic credentials;
                     [(B)  there is actual financial exigency or the
  phasing out of the institution's programs requiring elimination of
  the faculty member's position; or
                     [(C)  there is other good cause as defined in the
  institution's policies; and
               [(3)  provide] for a periodic performance evaluation
  process for all tenured faculty at the institution.
         [(c-2)]  The governing board may design its policies and
  procedures to fit the institution's particular educational
  mission, traditions, resources, and circumstances relevant to the
  institution's character, role, and scope, in addition to other
  relevant factors determined by the governing board in the policies
  and procedures adopted under this section.  The governing board
  shall seek advice and comment from the institution's faculty before
  adopting any policies and procedures under this section.  The
  advice and comment from the faculty on the performance evaluation
  of tenured faculty shall be given the utmost consideration by the
  governing board.
         (c) [(c-3)]  In addition to any other provisions adopted by
  the governing board, the policies and procedures adopted by the
  governing board under Subsection (b) [(c-1)] must include
  provisions providing that:
               (1)  each tenured faculty member at the institution be
  subject to a comprehensive performance evaluation process
  conducted no more often than once every year, but no less often than
  once every six years, after the date the faculty member was granted
  tenure or received an academic promotion at the institution;
               (2)  the comprehensive performance evaluation be based
  on the professional responsibilities of the faculty member, in
  teaching, research, service, patient care, and administration, and
  include peer review of the faculty member;
               (3)  the comprehensive performance evaluation process
  be directed toward the professional development of the faculty
  member;
               (4)  the comprehensive performance evaluation process
  incorporate commonly recognized academic due process rights,
  including notice of the manner and scope of the comprehensive
  performance evaluation, the opportunity to provide documentation
  during the comprehensive performance evaluation process, and,
  before a faculty member may be subject to disciplinary action on the
  basis of a comprehensive performance evaluation conducted under
  this subsection, notice of specific charges and an opportunity for
  hearing on those charges; and
               (5)  a faculty member be subject to revocation of
  tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if, during the
  comprehensive performance evaluation, incompetency, neglect of
  duty, or other good cause is determined to be present [; and
               [(6)  for a faculty member who receives an
  unsatisfactory rating in any area of any evaluation conducted under
  this section, the evaluation process provide for a short-term
  development plan that includes performance benchmarks for
  returning to satisfactory performance].
         (d)  A faculty member subject to termination on the basis of
  an evaluation conducted under this section must be given the
  opportunity for referral of the matter to a nonbinding alternative
  dispute resolution process as described in Chapter 154, Civil
  Practice and Remedies Code. If both parties agree, another type of
  alternative dispute resolution method may be elected. The governing
  board must give specific reasons in writing for any decision to
  terminate a faculty member on the basis of an evaluation conducted
  under this section.
         SECTION 4.  The following provisions of the Education Code
  are repealed:
               (1)  Section 51.942(a)(4); and
               (2)  Section 51.942(c-4).
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.