LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT

89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 16, 2025

TO:
Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
 
FROM:
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1281 by Parker (relating to certain criminal offenses involving mail or a mail receptacle key or lock; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

The bill would expand the conduct constituting the criminal offense of mail theft to include mail that is still in transit and when the intent of the theft is to steal a negotiable instrument. Mail theft of a negotiable instrument would be punishable across a range of penalties from a state jail felony to a first degree felony according to the number of negotiable instruments stolen, with increased punishment at the next higher category in certain circumstances when the addressee was a disabled or elderly individual. The bill would also create the third degree felony offense of obtaining, possessing, duplicating, transferring or using a postal service mail receptacle key or lock with the intent to harm, defraud, or deprive another of that person's property, and make it punishable as a second degree felony if the actor has been previously convicted for the offense.

Creating a new criminal offense and expanding conduct constituting an existing offense may result in an increase in demands upon state and local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement.

In fiscal year 2024, there were 779 arrests, 34 referrals, 36 placements onto adult community supervision, 15 individuals admitted into an adult state correctional institution, and no admissions into a juvenile state correctional institution for mail theft offenses.

The impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources cannot be determined due to a lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct outlined in the bill's provisions that would be subject to criminal penalties.




Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
JMc, MGol, DGI