TO:	Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

FROM:	Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

IN RE:	SB2878 by Hughes (relating to the operation and administration of and practices and procedures related to proceedings in the judicial branch of state government, including court security, court documents and arrest warrants, document delivery, juvenile boards, and youth diversion, and to public office candidate eligibility; increasing a criminal penalty; authorizing fees.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

SYNOPSIS OF PROVISIONS AND ACTUARIAL EFFECTS

Among other things, the bill would make clarifying changes to provisions related to the Texas Business Court, such as creating new judicial districts, expanding jurisdiction for county courts at law, and modifying juror qualifications and exemptions. The bill would also provide additional compensation increases from the state to any judge of a business court.

According to the actuarial analysis for the Judicial Retirement System Plan 2 (JRS-II), if the additional compensation was not considered pensionable earnings (no contributions paid or benefits earned), then there would be no impact to JRS II. However, to the extent the additional compensation was included in pensionable earnings, there would be some impact to JRS II, but it would not be material.

SOURCES:

Actuarial Analysis by Dana Woolfrey, FSA, EA, MAAA, Thomas Bevins, ASA, MAAA, and Joe Newton, FSA, EA, MAAA, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, April 7, 2025

ERS Correspondence, April 7, 2025

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas

ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION


May 23, 2025